So far the jury is out on that one. I, too, am of the belief that China's stature in the world has been and will continue to be damaged by the government's unwillingness to do anything to stop the destruction of private and government property. It's one thing to demonstrate peacefully but it is a different affair when the government does nothing to halt the wanton destruction of property.
In my mind, I sure hope the Chinese 'nationalists' turn their efforts on throwing out the communists. Perhaps these past few weeks of demonstrations are mere 'training exercises' before the young demonstrators begin dismantling the pillars of communism. When that happens I will stand and applaud their actions. Until then, I hope the Chinese demonstrators will refrain from hurting others.
From the Nikkei News
OPINION: Stone Hits Person Who Throws It
TOKYO (Nikkei)--Why do Chinese demonstrators throw stones at the Japanese embassy and other properties? Why do they burn the national flag of another country?
Do they think these acts serve the interests of China, which is supposed to have become a full member of the international community by joining the World Trade Organization?
Video clips of the vandalism, which made us turn our eyes from the television screen, hurt most Japanese and provoked our anger. Protecting foreign diplomatic facilities from attack is one of the basic duties of a country under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
If China is unable to abide by such a fundamental rule, the country's qualifications for hosting the Olympic Games or a world exposition will be called into question.
After watching scenes of the Chinese security police letting demonstrators throw stones, Japanese people cannot help but believe that the Chinese authorities tacitly approve of the protests since it cannot be believed that Chinese people are allowed greater freedom of assembly or association than Japanese are.
The protesters' slogan that "acts performed out of patriotism should not be punished" is tantamount to a declaration that anti-Japanese activities -- though not criticism of their own government -- should be tolerated.
Will their acts of throwing stones, PET bottles, eggs and other trash that damage Japanese restaurants run by Chinese lead to better relations between Japan and China?
The two countries have had a delicate relationship over more than 2,000 years. In spite of the fact that they are neighbors, or perhaps because of it, relations between Japan and China have consistently fluctuated between repulsion and rapprochement, with ambivalent feelings toward each other underlying the history of their relations.
Confrontation can only be resolved by bilateral talks and wisdom, which should arise from sincere exchanges. Numerous people in both countries have struggled to build a foundation for friendly Sino-Japanese relations since diplomatic normalization occurred 30 years ago.
The vandalism committed by the Chinese protesters could instantly break apart what has been built up through strenuous effort. China must know that the violence has only turned the hearts of many Japanese, who had warm feelings toward China, away from the country.
Chinese Web sites abound with calls by the country's pundits for the public to prepare for an upcoming war between the two nations. However, there are no Japanese who think the country will go to war against China.
China does not need to point out that Japan is also to blame for the deterioration in bilateral relations. We are fully aware of that.
Since 1975, the late Emperor Showa, as well as the current emperor, have forgone visits to Yasukuni Shrine, no doubt because in 1978, class-A war criminals were added to other Japanese war dead that are commemorated there.
Nevertheless, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has defiantly continued to visit the shrine, arguing that class-A war criminals should not be treated differently in paying respects to the spirits of those who died for Japan.
He has a significant obligation to take action to break the impasse that has emerged in Sino-Japanese relations.
As for the textbook issue, only a few schools have adopted the books China has taken issue with. It is absurd to allow such a matter to damage diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Many Japanese entertain doubts about the prime minister's diplomatic stance toward China. At a time when more than 30,000 Japanese companies are doing business with Chinese firms, the clash of nationalism is unfortunate for everyone concerned.
A certain degree of difference in interpreting history is unavoidable between two nations. But China's present criticism of Japan is based on too many unfounded assertions and misunderstandings.
There is no way to settle the dispute other than by holding bilateral talks. To facilitate such meetings, China must first halt the excessive anti-Japan campaign by some of its citizens.
-- Translated from an article written by Yasuhiro Tase, Nikkei columnist.
(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Monday morning edition)
Recent Comments